18-Month Master Plan

RAIDT Commercialisation — Project Plan

Owner: Mohammad Ali Akeel
Period: May 2026 – November 2027 (18 months)
Status: Planning / pre-execution
Last updated: 2026-05-10

This is the master plan for taking RAIDT from PhD research framework to commercially licensed methodology and product. It ties together the supporting deliverables in this folder:

File Purpose
00_Project_Plan_Master.md This document — single source of truth for the plan
01_KTP_Outreach_Template.md Industry partner outreach (Phase 1 onwards)
02_ICURe_Explore_Application.md Innovate UK customer-discovery funding (Phase 1)
03_Big4_Licensing_Pitch_Deck.md Big-4 audit firm licensing pitch (Phase 2 onwards)
04_UK_Trademark_Applications_RAIDT_RAIT.md Trade-mark filing pack (Phase 1)
05_IP_Strategy_Memo_Portsmouth_TechTransfer.md Memo to Tech Transfer Office (Phase 0)

1. Vision and outcome

18-month outcome target: RAIDT operating as a peer-reviewed, trade-marked, standards-engaged methodology with at least:

Long-term (3–5 year) ambition: RAIDT cited as reference methodology in UK and EU AI assurance practice, with a sustainable commercial vehicle (spin-out, licensee, or open-core community) and a defensible market position.


2. Workstreams

The plan runs six parallel workstreams. They overlap but have different rhythms.

ID Workstream Cadence Lead support
A IP & Brand Protection Front-loaded, then maintenance Portsmouth Tech Transfer
B Academic Outputs Continuous Supervisors (Mark Xu, Awais, Salem)
C Commercial Discovery Intense in Phase 1–2, then targeted ICURe programme + you
D Partnerships (KTP, Big-4, Sector) Continuous, slow build Portsmouth KTP Office + you
E Grant Funding Pipeline Wave-based Portsmouth Research Office + you
F Standards Engagement Slow burn, compounding Supervisors + BSI/ISO contacts

3. Phase plan

Phase 0 — Decisions that unblock everything (Week 0 — this week)

Goal: lock down ownership and authorisation. Do not start commercial outreach before this is done.

Action Owner Deliverable Due
Send IP Strategy Memo (file 05) to Portsmouth Tech Transfer You Email + meeting request Day 1
Book 30-min meeting with Tech Transfer You Calendar invite Day 3
Brief supervisors on commercialisation plan You 30-min meeting; sign-off Day 5
Decide: pursue Sovereign AI £9m round (closes 5 June 2026) — yes/no You + supervisors Documented decision Day 7

Decision gate at end of Week 0:


Phase 1 — Foundations (Weeks 1–4, May–early June 2026)

Goal: protective IP filed; commercial pipeline opened.

Stream A — IP & Brand

Stream B — Academic

Stream C — Commercial Discovery

Stream D — Partnerships

Stream E — Funding pipeline mapping

Stream F — Standards (preparation only)

Decision gate at end of Week 4:


Phase 2 — Validation (Weeks 5–12, June–August 2026)

Goal: run the customer-discovery learning loop; convert outreach into pipeline.

Stream A — IP & Brand

Stream B — Academic

Stream C — Commercial Discovery (the engine of this phase)

Stream D — Partnerships

Stream E — Grants

Stream F — Standards

Decision gate at end of Week 12:


Phase 3 — Commitment (Months 4–9, September 2026 – February 2027)

Goal: convert validated hypotheses into signed partnerships, awarded grants, and a clear commercial structure.

Stream A — IP & Brand

Stream B — Academic

Stream C — Commercial Discovery

Stream D — Partnerships

Stream E — Grants

Stream F — Standards

Decision gate at end of Month 9:


Phase 4 — Build & monetise (Months 10–18, March – November 2027)

Goal: deliver real customer outcomes; harden the product; reach sustainable revenue.

Stream A — IP & Brand

Stream B — Academic

Stream C — Commercial Discovery

Stream D — Partnerships

Stream E — Grants

Stream F — Standards

Decision gate at end of Month 18:


4. Critical path

The plan has five hard dependencies. Anything that drifts on these blocks downstream work.

Owner-of-record decision (Week 0)
        ↓
Trade-mark filings (Week 4)
        ↓
NDA template approved (Week 4)
        ↓
Commercial outreach at scale (Week 5+)
        ↓
ICURe Discovery findings (Week 16)
        ↓
Commercialisation route decision (Month 9)
        ↓
Spin-out / licence / open-core instantiation (Month 12)

Watch-outs:


5. Resource and capacity plan

You are a single PhD researcher. The plan must respect that. Here is who does what:

Activity You Supervisors Tech Transfer KTP Office External
Strategic decisions Lead Sign-off Inform Inform
Trade-mark filing Draft Approve & file TM attorney (clearance)
Commercial outreach Lead Endorse Co-pitch on KTP
ICURe execution Lead (interviews) Light review Light review ICURe programme support
KTP applications Co-author Co-author Light review Lead the paperwork
Big-4 pitches Lead Optional co-pitch
Standards engagement Co-lead Lead representation BSI / ISO secretariat
Paper revisions Lead Co-author

Estimated effort allocation per week (during Phase 1–2):

This assumes ~40 hrs/wk on the PhD overall. Adjust if you have a parallel job.


6. Budget summary (your out-of-pocket exposure)

Item Cost Funded by
UK trade marks (RAIDT + RAIT) £640 Portsmouth Tech Transfer (negotiate) or personal
TM clearance search (professional, if needed) £400–800 Tech Transfer
EU + US trade marks (Phase 3) ~£2,500 Tech Transfer or spin-out
ICURe Explore (if awarded) £35k Innovate UK
ICURe Discover (if progressed) ~£75k Innovate UK
KTP project £150–300k total 50–67% Innovate UK + partner contribution
Travel / events / conferences £2–4k/yr Portsmouth research budget + grants
Legal review of licence terms (Phase 3) £3–8k Tech Transfer / spin-out

Personal cash exposure: minimal if Tech Transfer covers TM filings. This is structured deliberately so you don't fund commercialisation out of personal funds.


7. Risk register

Risk Likelihood Impact Mitigation
Owner-of-record dispute slows trade-mark filings Medium High Engage Tech Transfer Week 0; escalate via supervisor
RAIT clashes with existing trade mark Medium Medium Clearance search before filing; rebrand path identified
ICURe not awarded Medium Medium Run leaner self-funded discovery
No KTP partner signs in 6 months Low–Medium High Diversify outreach across 3+ segments; Big-4 path is independent
Big-4 pilots fail to convert Medium Medium Document learnings; pivot to mid-tier or vendor licensing
Standards engagement is slow High Low (long-term moat, not near-term revenue) Accept slow tempo; treat as compound interest
University spin-out terms unattractive Medium High Explore licence-back arrangement as Plan B
Bandwidth / burnout High High Schedule explicit non-PhD time; delegate where Portsmouth offers support
Sovereign AI larger programme delayed or scope shifts Medium Medium Don't depend on it; it's a stretch goal, not a baseline
EU AI Act enforcement timeline shifts Low Low Methodology is regulation-agnostic

8. Tracking and metrics

Maintain a single tracking sheet (Excel / Google Sheet / Notion / Obsidian Bases). Update weekly.

Headline KPIs:

Metric Phase 1 target Phase 2 target Phase 3 target Phase 4 target
Trade marks filed 2 2 (in examination) 2 (registered UK) 2 UK + EU + US
KTP outreach emails sent 6 25 50 75
First meetings held 0 5 12 25
Active partnership conversations 0 3 6 8–12
Signed KTP applications 0 0 1 1 in delivery + 1 new
Paid pilots / licences 0 0 1 2–3
Customer-discovery interviews 0 30–100 130 175
Grant applications submitted 1 (ICURe) 2–3 4–5 6–8
Grants awarded 0 0–1 1–2 2–3
Papers published / accepted 1 2 3 4
Standards forum participation 0 1 (observer) 2 (contributor) 3 (cited)
ARR or licence revenue £0 £0 £80–150k pilot £200k+/yr

Weekly review (15 min, Sunday):

Monthly review (90 min, last working day of month):


9. Decision triggers

These are situations that should trigger a deliberate replan rather than continuing on autopilot.

Trigger Action
Tech Transfer cannot confirm owner-of-record within 4 weeks Escalate to Faculty Dean and Research Director
Three months of outreach with zero meetings booked Run a structured root-cause review with supervisors; reconsider value proposition
Customer-discovery interviews show no willingness to pay above £20k/yr Re-evaluate audit-firm-licensing route; pivot toward open-core or training-only model
Two KTP applications fail at assessment Engage Innovate UK programme manager; reshape applications based on feedback
RAIDT cited unfavourably or competitor framework reaches BSI first Accelerate standards engagement; consider co-authoring rather than competing
Sovereign AI larger programme opens with relevant asset class Move scoping to Phase 2 priority; assemble consortium
Senior Big-4 partner shows strong interest with exclusivity ask Engage Tech Transfer urgently; do not commit terms without legal review

10. The next 7 days — your starting checklist

If nothing else, do these seven things this week.

Start with the email to Tech Transfer. Everything else flows from owner-of-record being settled.

Powered by Forestry.md