18-Month Master Plan
RAIDT Commercialisation — Project Plan
Owner: Mohammad Ali Akeel
Period: May 2026 – November 2027 (18 months)
Status: Planning / pre-execution
Last updated: 2026-05-10
This is the master plan for taking RAIDT from PhD research framework to commercially licensed methodology and product. It ties together the supporting deliverables in this folder:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
00_Project_Plan_Master.md |
This document — single source of truth for the plan |
01_KTP_Outreach_Template.md |
Industry partner outreach (Phase 1 onwards) |
02_ICURe_Explore_Application.md |
Innovate UK customer-discovery funding (Phase 1) |
03_Big4_Licensing_Pitch_Deck.md |
Big-4 audit firm licensing pitch (Phase 2 onwards) |
04_UK_Trademark_Applications_RAIDT_RAIT.md |
Trade-mark filing pack (Phase 1) |
05_IP_Strategy_Memo_Portsmouth_TechTransfer.md |
Memo to Tech Transfer Office (Phase 0) |
1. Vision and outcome
18-month outcome target: RAIDT operating as a peer-reviewed, trade-marked, standards-engaged methodology with at least:
- One signed KTP partnership delivering RAIDT in a regulated organisation
- One paid licence or pilot with an audit firm (Big-4 or mid-tier)
- One follow-on grant secured beyond ICURe (BridgeAI / RAi UK / Smart Grant / Sovereign AI larger programme)
- BSI or ISO working-group engagement underway
- Trilogy of papers published; PhD on track for submission
Long-term (3–5 year) ambition: RAIDT cited as reference methodology in UK and EU AI assurance practice, with a sustainable commercial vehicle (spin-out, licensee, or open-core community) and a defensible market position.
2. Workstreams
The plan runs six parallel workstreams. They overlap but have different rhythms.
| ID | Workstream | Cadence | Lead support |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | IP & Brand Protection | Front-loaded, then maintenance | Portsmouth Tech Transfer |
| B | Academic Outputs | Continuous | Supervisors (Mark Xu, Awais, Salem) |
| C | Commercial Discovery | Intense in Phase 1–2, then targeted | ICURe programme + you |
| D | Partnerships (KTP, Big-4, Sector) | Continuous, slow build | Portsmouth KTP Office + you |
| E | Grant Funding Pipeline | Wave-based | Portsmouth Research Office + you |
| F | Standards Engagement | Slow burn, compounding | Supervisors + BSI/ISO contacts |
3. Phase plan
Phase 0 — Decisions that unblock everything (Week 0 — this week)
Goal: lock down ownership and authorisation. Do not start commercial outreach before this is done.
| Action | Owner | Deliverable | Due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Send IP Strategy Memo (file 05) to Portsmouth Tech Transfer | You | Email + meeting request | Day 1 |
| Book 30-min meeting with Tech Transfer | You | Calendar invite | Day 3 |
| Brief supervisors on commercialisation plan | You | 30-min meeting; sign-off | Day 5 |
| Decide: pursue Sovereign AI £9m round (closes 5 June 2026) — yes/no | You + supervisors | Documented decision | Day 7 |
Decision gate at end of Week 0:
- Owner-of-record for RAIDT and RAIT confirmed (University / founder / spin-out)
- Supervisor support confirmed
- Sovereign AI £9m bid: go / no-go (recommend no-go — too tight, wait for £160m larger programme)
Phase 1 — Foundations (Weeks 1–4, May–early June 2026)
Goal: protective IP filed; commercial pipeline opened.
Stream A — IP & Brand
Stream B — Academic
Stream C — Commercial Discovery
Stream D — Partnerships
Stream E — Funding pipeline mapping
Stream F — Standards (preparation only)
Decision gate at end of Week 4:
- Trade marks filed
- ICURe submitted
- 6+ KTP outreach emails sent; reply-rate observable
- NDA template approved → unblocks deeper commercial conversations
Phase 2 — Validation (Weeks 5–12, June–August 2026)
Goal: run the customer-discovery learning loop; convert outreach into pipeline.
Stream A — IP & Brand
Stream B — Academic
Stream C — Commercial Discovery (the engine of this phase)
Stream D — Partnerships
Stream E — Grants
Stream F — Standards
Decision gate at end of Week 12:
- Customer-discovery findings synthesised
- Primary commercialisation route hypothesis confirmed (spin-out / licence / open-core)
- 1–2 KTP partners advancing to formal application
- 1 Big-4 firm advancing to pilot conversation OR de-prioritised with reason
Phase 3 — Commitment (Months 4–9, September 2026 – February 2027)
Goal: convert validated hypotheses into signed partnerships, awarded grants, and a clear commercial structure.
Stream A — IP & Brand
Stream B — Academic
Stream C — Commercial Discovery
Stream D — Partnerships
Stream E — Grants
Stream F — Standards
Decision gate at end of Month 9:
- Primary commercial vehicle decided and instantiated:
- Option A: Portsmouth spin-out incorporated; founder package agreed; pre-seed planning
- Option B: Exclusive or non-exclusive licence executed with at least one audit firm; ongoing royalty agreement
- Option C: Open-core model with hosted RAIT service; standalone company or licence-back arrangement
- At least one KTP project active
- At least one revenue-generating engagement (pilot or licence)
- Standards engagement visible in at least one published forum
Phase 4 — Build & monetise (Months 10–18, March – November 2027)
Goal: deliver real customer outcomes; harden the product; reach sustainable revenue.
Stream A — IP & Brand
Stream B — Academic
Stream C — Commercial Discovery
Stream D — Partnerships
Stream E — Grants
Stream F — Standards
Decision gate at end of Month 18:
- Annual recurring revenue ≥ £200k OR spin-out raised pre-seed ≥ £500k OR licence-out producing £150k+/yr
- Commercial vehicle stable; founder package finalised
- Product roadmap and team plan for next 24 months
- Public profile sufficient to attract inbound enquiries
4. Critical path
The plan has five hard dependencies. Anything that drifts on these blocks downstream work.
Owner-of-record decision (Week 0)
↓
Trade-mark filings (Week 4)
↓
NDA template approved (Week 4)
↓
Commercial outreach at scale (Week 5+)
↓
ICURe Discovery findings (Week 16)
↓
Commercialisation route decision (Month 9)
↓
Spin-out / licence / open-core instantiation (Month 12)
Watch-outs:
- If Tech Transfer takes longer than 2 weeks to engage → escalate via supervisor
- If RAIT clearance fails → rebrand decision should happen in Phase 1 not Phase 2 (rebranding mid-pipeline is expensive)
- If ICURe is not awarded → run a leaner self-funded discovery; do not skip discovery
- If no KTP partner signs → reconsider whether the methodology has product-market fit at the price point before pushing harder
5. Resource and capacity plan
You are a single PhD researcher. The plan must respect that. Here is who does what:
| Activity | You | Supervisors | Tech Transfer | KTP Office | External |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategic decisions | Lead | Sign-off | Inform | Inform | — |
| Trade-mark filing | Draft | — | Approve & file | — | TM attorney (clearance) |
| Commercial outreach | Lead | Endorse | — | Co-pitch on KTP | — |
| ICURe execution | Lead (interviews) | Light review | Light review | — | ICURe programme support |
| KTP applications | Co-author | Co-author | Light review | Lead the paperwork | — |
| Big-4 pitches | Lead | Optional co-pitch | — | — | — |
| Standards engagement | Co-lead | Lead representation | — | — | BSI / ISO secretariat |
| Paper revisions | Lead | Co-author | — | — | — |
Estimated effort allocation per week (during Phase 1–2):
- Academic / paper revisions: 12 hrs/wk
- Commercialisation activities: 15 hrs/wk
- PhD other (data, dissertation prep): 8 hrs/wk
- Reading / standards / strategy: 5 hrs/wk
This assumes ~40 hrs/wk on the PhD overall. Adjust if you have a parallel job.
6. Budget summary (your out-of-pocket exposure)
| Item | Cost | Funded by |
|---|---|---|
| UK trade marks (RAIDT + RAIT) | £640 | Portsmouth Tech Transfer (negotiate) or personal |
| TM clearance search (professional, if needed) | £400–800 | Tech Transfer |
| EU + US trade marks (Phase 3) | ~£2,500 | Tech Transfer or spin-out |
| ICURe Explore (if awarded) | £35k | Innovate UK |
| ICURe Discover (if progressed) | ~£75k | Innovate UK |
| KTP project | £150–300k total | 50–67% Innovate UK + partner contribution |
| Travel / events / conferences | £2–4k/yr | Portsmouth research budget + grants |
| Legal review of licence terms (Phase 3) | £3–8k | Tech Transfer / spin-out |
Personal cash exposure: minimal if Tech Transfer covers TM filings. This is structured deliberately so you don't fund commercialisation out of personal funds.
7. Risk register
| Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Owner-of-record dispute slows trade-mark filings | Medium | High | Engage Tech Transfer Week 0; escalate via supervisor |
| RAIT clashes with existing trade mark | Medium | Medium | Clearance search before filing; rebrand path identified |
| ICURe not awarded | Medium | Medium | Run leaner self-funded discovery |
| No KTP partner signs in 6 months | Low–Medium | High | Diversify outreach across 3+ segments; Big-4 path is independent |
| Big-4 pilots fail to convert | Medium | Medium | Document learnings; pivot to mid-tier or vendor licensing |
| Standards engagement is slow | High | Low (long-term moat, not near-term revenue) | Accept slow tempo; treat as compound interest |
| University spin-out terms unattractive | Medium | High | Explore licence-back arrangement as Plan B |
| Bandwidth / burnout | High | High | Schedule explicit non-PhD time; delegate where Portsmouth offers support |
| Sovereign AI larger programme delayed or scope shifts | Medium | Medium | Don't depend on it; it's a stretch goal, not a baseline |
| EU AI Act enforcement timeline shifts | Low | Low | Methodology is regulation-agnostic |
8. Tracking and metrics
Maintain a single tracking sheet (Excel / Google Sheet / Notion / Obsidian Bases). Update weekly.
Headline KPIs:
| Metric | Phase 1 target | Phase 2 target | Phase 3 target | Phase 4 target |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade marks filed | 2 | 2 (in examination) | 2 (registered UK) | 2 UK + EU + US |
| KTP outreach emails sent | 6 | 25 | 50 | 75 |
| First meetings held | 0 | 5 | 12 | 25 |
| Active partnership conversations | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8–12 |
| Signed KTP applications | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 in delivery + 1 new |
| Paid pilots / licences | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2–3 |
| Customer-discovery interviews | 0 | 30–100 | 130 | 175 |
| Grant applications submitted | 1 (ICURe) | 2–3 | 4–5 | 6–8 |
| Grants awarded | 0 | 0–1 | 1–2 | 2–3 |
| Papers published / accepted | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Standards forum participation | 0 | 1 (observer) | 2 (contributor) | 3 (cited) |
| ARR or licence revenue | £0 | £0 | £80–150k pilot | £200k+/yr |
Weekly review (15 min, Sunday):
- Which workstream is behind?
- What's the single most important action this week?
- Any decision gate approaching that needs supervisor input?
Monthly review (90 min, last working day of month):
- Update KPIs
- Review risk register
- Adjust phase plan if drift > 2 weeks on any critical path item
9. Decision triggers
These are situations that should trigger a deliberate replan rather than continuing on autopilot.
| Trigger | Action |
|---|---|
| Tech Transfer cannot confirm owner-of-record within 4 weeks | Escalate to Faculty Dean and Research Director |
| Three months of outreach with zero meetings booked | Run a structured root-cause review with supervisors; reconsider value proposition |
| Customer-discovery interviews show no willingness to pay above £20k/yr | Re-evaluate audit-firm-licensing route; pivot toward open-core or training-only model |
| Two KTP applications fail at assessment | Engage Innovate UK programme manager; reshape applications based on feedback |
| RAIDT cited unfavourably or competitor framework reaches BSI first | Accelerate standards engagement; consider co-authoring rather than competing |
| Sovereign AI larger programme opens with relevant asset class | Move scoping to Phase 2 priority; assemble consortium |
| Senior Big-4 partner shows strong interest with exclusivity ask | Engage Tech Transfer urgently; do not commit terms without legal review |
10. The next 7 days — your starting checklist
If nothing else, do these seven things this week.
Start with the email to Tech Transfer. Everything else flows from owner-of-record being settled.